Piaras Kelly PR - Public Relations in Ireland

5 Responses to “Food for thought”  

1. 1 Damien Mulley Oct 16th, 2005 at 6:41 pm

   “For all our talk about blogs, RSS, podcasts or whatever the latest buzzword of the day is, imagine what we could achieve if we put the same time and energy into providing running water for everyone around the world.”

   I don’t think the cause itself is as important in the short to medium term compared to making people actively do something about any cause. Anti-apathy Activism will impact the world more and at a faster pace. Running water is a noble cause and one that can have a dramatic effect on the lives of a few 100 to a few thousand people. I’m not saying people shouldn’t volunteer to do this, but there are various routes one can take to change the world and save lives. Going out to Africa and getting hands on is one way, but there are many others.

   Imagine if the likes of Bill Gates went off to Africa before he started Microsoft and helped bring clean water to the people there. He’d never have made his billions, he’d be a humble intelligent man impacting the lives of thousands of Africans. He’d have saved lives. But his charitable foundation would have never happened. The foundation which is investing a lot of money into preventing malaria, one of the biggest killers in the world. Research that could save the lives of millions.

   Imagine the person that made podcasts so accessible and univsersal that everyone in the world listened to them. And that a podcast on the plight of people in Africa managed to be delivered to half the desktops in the world. That one podcast could do more than 100 people building wells in Africa. I think people should see what they are best at, work on that but at the same time see how they can, via what they do, change the world for the better.

   If you can encourage the people of the world to recognise that the world needs to be better and that they can actually make it better then no matter what they do, the world will get better. You first need to build this foundation though. Technologists can do it in various ways. They can build some famous application that makes billions which then allows them to create a trust fund like Bill Gates did and that Google are doing, or you can research a better form of wireless communications that can be used cheaply by people in Africa to talk to each other.

   People like Robert Scoble and Jeff Jarvis are so good at what they do that they have the attention of a lot of very clever and influential people. Jeff is organising the Recovery 2.0 - http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/mtarchive/004502.html idea for better coordinating disaster relief initiatives via the Web. Scoble has the ear of an astounding number of the best tech minds around. If Scoble in the morning made a post suggesting some tech solution that could cut world hunger in half and asked his readership to create the application he had in mind, I would bet within a week the app would be rolled out.

   Even people with selfish motivations can make things better. All those self-evangelising rockstar idiots on the TV have saved lives and changed the world ever so slightly and of course stroked their ego. I don’t mind such a trade-off. We just need a world to become more altruistic. Let people that say charity begins at home ignore African charities if they instead improve the lives of people here by being xenophobically charitable.

   So, how can the Tech Camp people encourage the people of the world to get off their asses and do something? To realise that even something as boring as letter writing can make a difference? Humans in my possibly naive opinion are creatures who are inclined to help the group out and to go out of the way to make the group a better place. In the sound and fury of the modern world people probably feel seperated from the group. We need to make people realise that a drop in the ocean is more like the butterfly that can cause the typhoon.

2. 2 Justin Mason Oct 18th, 2005 at 1:05 am

   Hi Piaras –

   sounds like Tech Camp Ireland was a resounding success — I wish I could have been there, instead of 8000 miles away. Next year! It certainly could have done with somebody talking about open source, software patents, and the “copyfight” against IP maximalism.

   Anyway, re: ‘imagine what we could achieve if we put the same time and energy into providing running water for everyone around the world.’ This is a very Irish opinion, I’ve found, and one I strongly disagree with.

   In essence, it assumes that

   - Only certain causes are worth fighting for (in other words, it’s pointless to worry about data retention, IP maximalism, privacy, anti-spam, monopoly-fighting etc., when people are dying elsewhere in the world).

   - The existing ways of fighting for those causes, are the only ones worth using (in other words, TV, newspapers and radio provide enough coverage for issues).

   - Today’s technology is what we’ll be using in future, and new stuff is just pointless gadget-wanking (in other words, tech that’s incredibly new and hard to imagine using now, will not turn into the day-to-day for millions of people in ten years time).

   - Technology doesn’t affect the developing world (overlooking the creation of new communication systems like Skype, RSS, and the issues created by biopiracy, drug patenting, and IP maximalism like the TRIPS accord)

   in my opinion, all these are fallacies. Technology *does* become widely used, it does spread to the developing world, and stupid tech laws made here are often pushed to the developing world if we don’t *all* work together to stop them.

   –j.

3. 3 Piaras Oct 18th, 2005 at 6:10 pm

   This is why I love blogs. Getting different people’s perspectives on what was a throwaway topic is fascinating.

   You guys have changed my viewpoint.

1. 1 Damien Mulley’s Blog » Blog Archive » Rant about changing the world - I blame Piaras Pingback on Oct 23rd, 2005 at 3:21 am
2. 2 Winds and Breezes :: It’s a binary world out there Pingback on Jun 24th, 2006 at 4:21 pm

---

---

Leave a Reply

There was an error with your comment, please try again.

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website