Quick thought about how a lot of companies are approaching the Internet and the blog phenomenon. A lot of companies are eager to “embrace” bloggers in order to promote their products or services. By embrace though, I mean sell.
Do I really want to hear about your product or service via email though. I probably read about it in the paper, have received a piece of direct mail or seen an ad. What really makes you think that receiving an email about it will make that much of a difference? More importantly, why would you think that it would warrant me talking about it on this site?
Let’s take a really dull example. Pensions. Not that exciting, but everyone needs one. Why email someone about pension, when the word alone could send them to sleep?
That’s why talking is more important than selling. In terms of a strategy to target bloggers I think the best thing any company can do is to start their own blog, rather than targeting individual bloggers. If you can explain why pensions are so important, then you’ll sell your product to the masses.
People are looking for answers, but they don’t expect to have them fall in their lap. In fact, with so much choice out there, the purchase decision has become a lot more complicated and consumers take more time before signing on the dotted line.
A blog offers a platform to companies to take the time to explain their product or service and match it to individual consumers needs. Look at any company these days, they’ll offer a variety of products or services to fit the needs of a variety of segments. It doesn’t matter if it’s a confectionary, car or pension company.
So instead of going out there selling, companies should take more time to talk. Don’t force your product or service on consumers, simply explain why it fulfills their needs. I bet you’ll find that bloggers like me will be a lot more receptive then.
Technorati Tags: Blogging, Blogs, Piaras Kelly, PR
2 Responses to “Selling vs Talking”
Leave a Reply
Search
There are no recent tweets.
Categories
- Books (4)
- Buzz (3)
- E-PR (142)
- General (491)
- Ideas (7)
- Personal (77)
- PR in Ireland (87)
- Resources (5)
- Technology & PR (6)
Archives
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005

Or there’s always the Attention Trust.
I agree that companies will probably get better results by establishing two-way communication with their target audience versus a top-to-bottom flow of communication. I believe company newsletters, as well as blogs, are excellent tools for establishing such a relationship.
However, strict sales pitch emails do have their place…