The trade-off between quality and price

I’d like to claim credit for this, but a motoring journalist mentioned it during a discussion we had about outsourcing to China the other week. Although lower operating costs and the resulting increased profitability are the primary reasons why companies choose to move to the country, the Chinese have realised while foreigners may make their first purchase based on price, their repeated business is based on quality.

It’s something which impacts across a variety of sectors and highlights the fact that cheapest doesn’t necessarily mean best. A recent comment left by Courtney on my last post about Starbucks reinforces the point:

The sheer number of locations creates word of mouth. Their investment in training and ambiance makes that WOM positive. They claim opening new stores doesn’t cannibalize profits from other stores; it just reduces waiting times and offers convenience. For those getting their morning coffee, that’s the factor that counts. There’s something to be said for service. During the 70s and 80s, it was cut to increase profits. Now, service is the factor that actually creates profits.


Technorati Tags:


2 Responses to “The trade-off between quality and price”  

  1. 1 Tom

    An increase in service is a bit like looking at the Pareto rule. IN the Pareto rule, 80% of your business comes from 20% of your customers, so by spending money on the 20%, or by trying to get that 20% figure even higher, you can get more of a return than spending money on casual customers. It costs less to keep a customer than it does to wina new one, so making sure that they stay with you once they are there is sound business sense.

  2. 2 Doug

    http://www.amazon.com/Blown-Bits-Economics-Information-Transforms/dp/087584877X

    discusses trade-off between quality and price relationship has been eliminated since the internet.

Leave a Reply