We only have a finite amount of time on our hands
4 Comments Published February 5th, 2007 in GeneralKenneth Li on the Reuters Blog points out the obvious:
It took a study to discover that blacking out and waking up to discover you’ve lost half of your Sunday trolling through YouTube also steals time from watching TV. A recent Harris Interactive poll showed that out of 2,309 U.S. adults, some 363 of them were avid YouTube watchers. 32 percent of these YouTube viewers said it took away from their TV time.
As sites like Bebo or YouTube explode in terms of popularity, the time people spend using these new mediums invariably means that newspaper readership, television viewing figures and radio listenership will decline. It isn’t because they are suddenly deemed unpopular overnight, but because there is only so much time in the day.
What people need to realise is that these declines aren’t terminal and a natural equilibrium will be reached. The most important thing to take from this however is to note that media fragmentation doesn’t only apply to traditional media. Some people would like you to believe that blogs will replace newspapers. However, as the Irish data from the Edelman Trust Barometer goes to show (I’ll discuss this in more length later), blogs are only one aspect of peer-to-peer communications.
We’re moving from the era of the blockbuster to the era of settling for less. The Oscars will be aired this week, but as each year passes the spectacle’s influence declines that bit more. It doesn’t matter if they blog it, podcast it or whatevercast it, in the era of the abundance of information people have so much to choose from, but limited time to experience it.
Technorati Tags: Edelman, Media Fragmentation, Piaras Kelly, YouTube
Search
There are no recent tweets.
Categories
- Books (4)
- Buzz (3)
- E-PR (142)
- General (491)
- Ideas (7)
- Personal (77)
- PR in Ireland (87)
- Resources (5)
- Technology & PR (6)
Archives
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005

Some disjointed points.
5%. That’s what 32% of 363 out of 2,309 is. 5%. Given the small sample size, you’d guess that 5% is probably also the margin of error. But that’s the problem with statistics. You can make them mean anything. Or nothing.
The argument that YouTube might be taking from TV depends upon where people are doing their YouTubing. At home? Or (more likely) in the office? So is it media that is being taken from, or actually working hours? Or other surfing?
Radio listenership is an interesting thing to include, especially after last weeks UK radio stats were released. Overall, radio listenership continues to grow. Radios on mobile phones, radio on the web and listening to your old fashioned radio while surfing the web are all adding to radio’s audience.
From a personal POV, I find I’m constantly culling sites from my bookmarks (still don’t believe in RSS, sorry) and constantly culling podcasts and vodcasts from iTunes. I just don’t have enough time to consume them all and live a life. And the more that is added, the more I have to delete in order to fit more into the same amount of time.
Am looking forward to your Edelman Trust barometer stats. I expect they will be quite enlightening (are these the stats that put Techies ahead of TDs on the trust level, as reported last week?).
I’d agree, my online reading list goes up and down like a yo-yo and there’s only about four podcasts that I listen to.
You’re refering to the same research, but we didn’t compare techies to TDs unfortunately. It’s looking like it’ll be next Monday before I get round to discussing it though.
Piaras – I think it was The Register I read it in. Tech was the best industry, with a seventy-something per cent trust rating. Elsewhere in the story, it noted that that the government had a trust rating of below forty per cent. I’m probably exaggerating a little to go from government to TDs, but it’s worth it for alliterative pruposes
Yeah that’s the research, although the data you’re quoting is from two different droups: most trusted industry and trust by institution.
Technology was the most trusted industry in Ireland and globally.
Out of business, the media, government in general, religious institutions and NGOS, business ranked first, then NGOS. Religious institutions ranked bottom. Off the top of my head though I can’t remember media and government in general ranked third and fourth or vice versa.