Ireland is in the middle of the aftermath of a general election with Fianna Fail emerging as the dominant party, but looking to make up the numbers to form a stable government. As someone with no allegiance to any particular political party, I have to say that the whole affair was fascinating to watch – espeicially the night of the election count when the winners and losers began to emerge.
Despite being a bit of a techie, I hope that we never introduce e-voting because the drama around the country in the count centres was nail-biting for anyone with a passing interest in politics. Sitting in O’Reillys pub, everyone kept one eye glued to the television set. When it was finally announced that Michael McDowell, one of the most controversial politicians in Ireland, had lost his seat, we were all spellbound. Whatever you think of the man, I thought he went out with class by accepting the opinion of the public and then bowing out of public life.
From a communications consultant’s point of view, the most fascinating issue of the election was the issue of Bertie Ahern’s finances and his upcoming appearance at the Mahon Tribunal. I marvelled at how all the parties danced around the issue. Fine Gael and Labour steered clear of the issue after getting their fingers burned when they raised the issue previously. The only time they slipped was when Enda Kenny, leader of Fine Gael, pointed the finger at Michael McDowell, leader of the PDs, for leaking information about the issue. As it turned out, it came back to haunt the PDs who effectively went missing one weekend prior to the vote as they sought clarity from the Taoiseach about the affair. Ultimately this backfired as transfers from their coalition partners plummeted.
From a blogger’s perspective, Damien Mulley has some great commentary on the role of the Internet in the general election. As Mulley points out, blogs didn’t have a huge influence but featured heavily in media coverage in the runup to the vote. In my mind, bloggers cemented their position in the media ecosystem in the course of the general election. In the past it was much harder for the public to bring a story to the media, but now their news and opinions feature regularly in the press.
As a medium the Internet definitely proved its worth. Silicon Republic reported that RTE recorded five million hits on election day compared with the average of just over a million visitors due to the public broadcaster’s extensive election 2007 coverage.
However Damien Mulley is right to question whether many of the politicians who suddenly began posting videos to YouTube in the runup to the election in a bid to attract the youth vote will continue in another post. Personally I don’t think politicians understood the role of YouTube. If young people are not interested in politics, don’t expect them to get very excited and vote for you because they have a Bebo page or YouTube video. It serves as a much better medium to highlight local issues to the electorate.
Technorati Tags: Damien Mulley, Piaras Kelly, Politics, PR, Public Relations
Search
There are no recent tweets.
Categories
- Books (4)
- Buzz (3)
- E-PR (142)
- General (491)
- Ideas (7)
- Personal (77)
- PR in Ireland (87)
- Resources (5)
- Technology & PR (6)
Archives
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005

Hi, Piaras. I am a public relations and political science student from the University of Georgia.
I’m wondering if your assessment of YouTube’s viability (and other social media, for that matter) in political campaigns will hold true for long, considering the increasing use of the Internet by older users. For instance, my 50-year-old mother has recently discovered online shopping and the joys of my only photo sharing. Who’s to say that next she won’t start cruising YouTube?
I’d argue that politicians can use YouTube to reach older audiences, not just as an attempt to reach the younger demographics. As a young person about to graduate with a PR degree, it is certainly a goal of mine to never discount older folks as a target online audience.
I agree Cain, I think that by using YouTube politicians will end up talking to those audiences as opposed to people voting for the first time simply because the majority of young people aren’t interested in politics. Just because they’re not getting through to their intended target, it doesn’t mean that they shouldn’t turn away from YouTube. Like you say, they should use it to target older audiences.
It’s a content rich medium that is underutilised. There is a politician in the States who uses social media to highlight problems in the area like graffati and his progress in fixing them. Ideal for older audiences who are more likely to be involved in residents committees.