Why innovation laughs in the face of statistics
Published June 5th, 2007 in GeneralLance Davis has an article in The Register about why the Apple won’t sell ten million iPhones in 2008.
Davis picks apart Steve Jobs’ rationale behind his 2008 sales prediction that “10 million iPhones is one per cent of the mobile phone market”, arguing that he is not comparing like with like:
The vast majority of those phones are super cheap. The smartphone category, which is closest to iPhone territory, is very different. Symbian has sold 100 million smartphones in the last 10 years. BlackBerry hasn’t reached the 10 million figure yet. It’s a bit like saying the world car market is 18 million cars so McLaren can sell 180,000 because that’s only one per cent. In practice, it sold 28 cars last year.
In actual fact Davis isn’t comparing like with like. The iPhone isn’t competing so much with smartphone as it is carving its own niche by becoming as iconic as the iPod before it. In a focus group of teenagers that I observed earlier this year, all the participants had it as top of their wishlists. While its price may make it out of their reach when it is eventually launched in Ireland, it is wetting the appetite of consumers worldwide. With ads like this who could blame them? The iPhone is being positioned as something completely different.
If you followed the rationale of Davis’s argument then innovation would be stifled at every turn. You can’t use research to predict how markets that don’t exist yet will operate.
There are other reasons why the iPhone might fail, but not due to the reasons Davis outlines.
Technorati Tags: Apple, iPhone, Piaras Kelly
Search
Categories
- Books (4)
- Buzz (7)
- E-PR (209)
- General (302)
- Ideas (9)
- Personal (106)
- PR in Ireland (145)
- Resources (12)
- Technology & PR (7)
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005

While I totally disdain the business-justification of ‘If I get just 1% of this market we’ll make millions’ approach, here’s another question along the same line: If the iPhone get’s just 1% of the iPod market how many will they sell? Being as it is essential an iPod, with Video, and a Camera, and a Phone, and a few other bits.
And I agree, it’s not competing with Smartphones … it’s competing with fashion-phones and tech-phones. The Nokia 8800 Sirocco, the Blackberry Pearl, the Helio, the Sidekick …basically all phones OTHER than the low-end cheap ones.
If a betting shop had a bet on for numbers of phones, I’d bet 10m for 2008. I’d bet it for 2007 in months too if Apple had been smart enough to launch in Europe - where Mac is strong, but the mobile market is WAY stronger than in the US.
1% of the iPod market is 0.9 million.
How many kids will be demanding iPhones for Christmas?
The iPod was more expensive by most other mp3 players on the market and still is, yet it destroyed the competition. The iPhone is not competiting with the phone market. It is competiting with everything that makes people feel like a bit of a trendy. Watches, iPhones, other expensive gadgets, runners, XBoxes, diamond earrings and tattoos. How much of these markets are impulse purchases that gather dust in the end? The iPhone will grab that money too. I think Jobs is being conservative with his numbers just so he can wow shareholders when they release sales figures.
http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/personal_tech/article1889304.ece
It will be interesting to see how the competition get on!