<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama - Why Content Is More Important Than Statistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pkellypr.com/blog/2008/1117/obama-why-content-is-more-important-than-statistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pkellypr.com/blog/2008/1117/obama-why-content-is-more-important-than-statistics/</link>
	<description>Irish Communications Consultant - Be Noticed</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Nagurski</title>
		<link>http://www.pkellypr.com/blog/2008/1117/obama-why-content-is-more-important-than-statistics/#comment-593455</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Nagurski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pkellypr.com/blog/?p=866#comment-593455</guid>
		<description>“For Obama, the issue was to find people to come into the system and become door-knockers.”

Obama harnessed people who had not in the past joined a political campaign. He connected people, created communities and give them meaningful jobs to do.

I take those as the two key points from the article as quoted - engagement and activation. 

Obama used the Internet to make people active and to continue the conversation in their neighbourhoods.  Looking at simple statistics like the number of people contacted is a hang-over from traditional media advertising models - eyeballs win the day.

Where the Internet can really deliver is in it's ability to facilitate and encourage the actions of many around a single idea. Content, as you rightly say, is the fuel for that process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“For Obama, the issue was to find people to come into the system and become door-knockers.”</p>
<p>Obama harnessed people who had not in the past joined a political campaign. He connected people, created communities and give them meaningful jobs to do.</p>
<p>I take those as the two key points from the article as quoted - engagement and activation. </p>
<p>Obama used the Internet to make people active and to continue the conversation in their neighbourhoods.  Looking at simple statistics like the number of people contacted is a hang-over from traditional media advertising models - eyeballs win the day.</p>
<p>Where the Internet can really deliver is in it&#8217;s ability to facilitate and encourage the actions of many around a single idea. Content, as you rightly say, is the fuel for that process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
